data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a481a/a481acc60107d0d408e46d9580188a2bbf28aa72" alt="Sandra orlow nude set thread"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/082da/082da166d4730e8a620012cc787d8d64a5bb50eb" alt="sandra orlow nude set thread sandra orlow nude set thread"
The site has been known to host child pornography as a result, it was filtered out from Google Search in 2015. The site has been linked to white supremacism, neo-Nazism, the alt-right, racism and antisemitism, hate crimes, and multiple mass shootings. An owner moderates each board, with minimal interaction from site administration. Live and let live.8kun, previously called 8chan, Infinitechan or Infinitychan (stylized as ∞chan), is an imageboard website composed of user-created message boards. Stop the prissy stalinist censorship of those you don't agree with. I am betting that the same people who are trying to censor MR would be the ones trying to put mencheviks, trotskyists, or liberals against the wall in the USSR of the 1920s, burn the Jews in Spain in the 1500s, and send the "reds" to jail in the USA of the 1950s. How much do we want to bet that the same people sent both? After the liberation, they sent 15 million anonymous letters of denunciation. Under nazi occupation, the French sent 14 millions anonymous letter of denunciation to the Gestapo. A written campaign to demonize him is exactly what happened repeatedly in the 30s to all the artists that ended up shortly after in the Gulag - simply because their artistic/ behavioral sensitivity and beliefs did not agree with the stalinist regime. The image, and its caption, are HIS vision. It is not inciting anyone to commit crimes. "Lolita" is not even close to pornographic. We must respect it - they rest is up to us.ĭid MR violate the law? Not even his worst accuser would say that. Our society has a minimal set of normative rules, which all of us have to agree with in order to live together - it's our legal system. The artist is Michael Reichman, a recognized photographer. Let's see, what exactly is happening? A mob is trying to shame an artist/ writer/ publisher into retracting/ withdrawing/ censoring his published piece, because of what they read into his personality/ belief/ sensibility. Boy - I have not posted for a couple of years, even when some provocative topics came up - but I could not avoid this one.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a481a/a481acc60107d0d408e46d9580188a2bbf28aa72" alt="Sandra orlow nude set thread"